"Great many" is offensive and an irrational, likely unsupported by the facts, statement. Great many means kinda sorta everyone but you.
-DJS
You are committing the formal logical fallacy of False Equivocation. “Great many” does NOT mean "everyone one but me." Rather, “great many” means a large number of people. You are trying to add things which are not there. There is nothing offensive, irrational, or unsupported about it. Which is more then I can say about your comment.
And you made definitive 'conclusions' about why the great many are responding as you describe, that they "think that since they figured out TTATT, they must therefore be a highly intelligent and incredibly rational individual." That's an unsupported, likely erroneous, definitive statement. Have you any data which supports such a definitive statement?
DJS
Awe that's cute, you're acting like you're going to teach me a lesson. Adorable! Fortunately for me, you're demonstrably wrong. People on this forum continuously call others stupid, idiot, moron, illogical, irrational, and conduct all other manner of ad hominem attacks. And people on this forum also speak at great length about how much smarter they are than all the elders and the MS who are still JWs. And when another member on this website points out a valid problem with their logic - they lash out call the other party calling them “illogical” without taking any consideration of their own position. So yes, my statement is both supported and factual.
Your presentation skills can stand some improvement.
-DJS
I am open to any suggestions you might have.
I am fairly intelligent but I have real blank spots in my mind for some forms of argument or debate.
-humbled
Everyone has mental blind spots. The human brain is not particularly good at logic. That’s why its something we have to learn. Here’s a really good video that is easy to understand and covers some of the basics. The person has a whole series of videos on debate but they’ve got the kind of voice and demeanor that instantly puts you at ease. I recomend his vdeos to everyone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI&list=UUc_xdkOBgSYLmXTn-VSQ4uA
I maintain a broad brush was used.
-jgnat
How come?
(I can’t address your concerns if you don’t qualify them)
Coded Logic, how do you know that they didn't ask "does that apply to me?", and *then* ask you?
-Onager
Because the two questions I asked in my OP were, "Do you know what logic is?" and "Have you ever studied logic?" Instead of considering these they instead asked "How do we know you're not suffering from the DK effect?"
Whether or not I'm suffering from the DK effect is Red Herring. It in no way effects the validity of the questions I posed. And, had the person considered their own position and their own understanding of logic - instead of worrying about mine - they would have known that. So no, it wasn't an "assumption" as you so crudely assert. Rather, its what's known as inductive reasoning. Here's a good site you can read up on it:
http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/types_reasoning/induction.htm